Research Area Autecology of forest species; plant water relations; plant responses to burial. Description of Research I study forest ecology, particularly the factors that limit where forest tree species can grow. Current research is emphasizing water relations of trees of the Himalayas and North America. In addition, since 1980 I have studied recovery of plants from burial by volcanic debris from Mount St. Helens. |
Research Group Members Graduate Students
BOT 341 Plant Ecology |
|
Related Publications Zobel, D.B. and J.A. Antos. 1992. Survival of plants buried for eight growing seasons by volcanic tephra. Ecology 73:698-701. Singh, S.P., B.S. Adhikari, and D.B. Zobel. 1994. Biomass, productivity, leaf longevity, and forest structure in the central Himalaya. Ecological Monographs 64:401-421. Zobel, D.B., J. Ram, and S.S. Bargali. 1995. Structural and physiological changes in Quercus leucotrichophora and Pinus roxburghii associated with stand disturbance in the Kumaun Himalaya, India. International Jour. Ecol. Envir. Sci. 21: 45-66. Zobel, D.B. 1996. Variation of water relations parameters with extended rehydration time, leaf form, season, and proportion of leaf. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 175-185. Zobel, D.B. 1996. Using twig starch levels as an index of tree stress in Himalyan forests. Pages 273-280 in Environment and Biodiversity (in the context of South Asia), P.K. Jha, G.P.S. Ghimire, S.B. Karmacharya, S.R. Baral and P. Lacoul (eds). Ecological Society (ECOS), Kathmandu, Nepal Zobel, D.B. and J.A. Antos.1997. A decade of recovery of understory vegetation buried by volcanic tephra from Mount St. Helens. Ecological Monographs 67:317-344. Zobel, D.B. and S. P. Singh.1997. Himalayan forests and ecological generalizations. BioScience 47:735-745. Zobel, D.B.1998. Chamaecyparis forests. A comparative analysis.Pages 39-53 IN A.D. Laderman, editor. Coastally Restricted Forests. Oxford University Press, New York. Zobel, D.B., S.C.
Garkoti, and S.P. Singh. 2001. Leaf Conductance of
Primary and Mature Needles of Pinus roxburghii: A Comparison. Journal of
Forest Research 6: 1-5. |
|